From Hippocampal Centrality to Functional Outcome

Mapping Psychosis Through a Multiscale Lens

The key to understanding psychosis may lie not in a single symptom or brain region, but in the complex interplay between our biology, cognition, and lived experience.

Introduction: The Complex Puzzle of Psychosis

Psychosis remains one of the most misunderstood conditions in mental health, often reduced to dramatic portrayals of hallucinations and breaks from reality. In truth, it represents a heterogeneous collection of biological and behavioral alterations that evolve over time, affecting how individuals think, feel, and navigate the world 1 . The condition carries substantial personal and societal costs, ranking among the leading causes of disability worldwide 1 .

Traditional approaches have struggled to capture the full complexity of psychosis, often examining symptoms or brain function in isolation. However, a revolutionary framework called multiscale neuroscience offers a new perspective, conceptualizing mental illness as arising from aberrant interactions across and within multiple biopsychosocial scales 1 .

This article explores how researchers are leveraging this framework to propose a comprehensive disease progression model of psychosis, revealing how hippocampal-cortical dysconnectivity can cascade through cognitive processes to ultimately impact daily functioning.

Multiscale Approach

Examining interactions across biological, cognitive, and functional domains to understand psychosis progression.

Hippocampal Centrality

The hippocampus functions as a crucial hub whose connectivity impacts multiple aspects of psychosis.

The Building Blocks: Key Concepts in Psychosis Research

Multiscale Neuroscience

Multiscale neuroscience represents a paradigm shift in how we study mental disorders. Rather than focusing exclusively on one level of analysis, this approach examines how processes across different scales interact over time 1 .

It acknowledges that changes at the biological level can influence cognitive function, which in turn affects symptoms and real-world functioning, creating feedback loops that can either worsen or improve outcomes 1 .

The Hippocampus

The hippocampus, a seahorse-shaped structure deep within the brain, has long been recognized for its role in memory formation. However, recent research has revealed its broader significance in psychosis 3 .

The hippocampus functions as a crucial hub within brain networks, with its connections to other cortical regions supporting not just memory but also social and cognitive processes 3 .

Symptom Dimensions

Psychosis manifests across multiple dimensions:

  • Positive symptoms: Additions to normal experience
  • Negative symptoms: Reductions in normal experience
  • Cognitive symptoms: Difficulties with mental processes

These dimensions are not isolated—research consistently shows they interact in complex ways .

Multiscale Progression Model

Hippocampal Connectivity
Episodic Memory
Social Cognition
Negative Symptoms
Functional Outcome

Changes at one level cascade through other domains, creating complex progression pathways

The Groundbreaking Experiment: Mapping Disease Progression with SuStaIn

Methodology

To address the heterogeneity of psychosis and test their multiscale progression model, researchers employed an innovative machine-learning algorithm called Subtype and Stage Inference (SuStaIn) 1 .

The study sampled data from two cross-sectional datasets of first- and multi-episode psychosis, resulting in a sample of 163 patients and 119 non-clinical controls 1 .

Assessment Domains
Neuroimaging Hippocampal connectivity
Cognitive testing Episodic memory
Clinical evaluation Negative symptoms
Functional measurement Real-world functioning

Results: Three Distinct Subtypes with Different Trajectories

The analysis revealed three distinct patient subtypes with different impairment profiles and disease trajectories:

Subtype Impairment Profile Clinical Presentation
Subtype 0 Normal-range performance on all variables Minimal impairments across biological, cognitive, and functional measures
Subtype 1 Lower episodic memory, social cognition, functional outcome, and higher negative symptoms Prominent cognitive and functional impairments with significant negative symptoms
Subtype 2 Lower hippocampal-cortical connectivity and episodic memory Primary neurological and memory impairments

Perhaps most intriguing were the different progression sequences identified for Subtype 1 and Subtype 2. For Subtype 2, the progression followed the predicted multiscale model, beginning with hippocampal dysconnectivity. However, Subtype 1 showed a different pattern, beginning with episodic memory impairments and ending with hippocampal dysconnectivity 1 .

Subtype 1 Progression

Episodic Memory

Initial cognitive impairments in memory function

Social Cognition

Difficulties in understanding social cues and interactions

Negative Symptoms

Development of motivational and emotional deficits

Functional Outcome

Impairment in real-world functioning

Hippocampal Dysconnectivity

Altered brain connectivity emerges later in progression

Subtype 2 Progression

Hippocampal Dysconnectivity

Initial alterations in brain network connectivity

Episodic Memory

Cognitive impairments follow neurological changes

Social Cognition

Social processing difficulties emerge

Functional Outcome

Impact on daily functioning

Negative Symptoms

Clinical symptoms manifest later in progression

"While the hippocampus seems to play a central role in leading the disease progression in Subtype 2, there might be other factors responsible for leading the progression in Subtype 1" .

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Resources in Psychosis Research

Modern psychosis research relies on a diverse array of methodological tools and approaches.

Tool/Resource Function Application in Psychosis Research
Structural MRI Visualizes brain anatomy and connectivity Measures hippocampal volume and cortical connectivity
Resting-state fMRI Assesses functional brain connectivity Evaluates hippocampal-cortical network integrity
Graph Theory Analysis Quantifies network properties Calculates participation coefficient of hippocampal circuitry
SuStaIn Algorithm Identifies subtypes and progression patterns Models heterogeneous disease trajectories
MATRICS Consensus Battery Standardized cognitive assessment Evaluates multiple cognitive domains affected in psychosis
Functional Outcome Measures Assesses real-world functioning Measures occupational and social functioning
Neuroimaging

Advanced imaging techniques to visualize brain structure and function

Computational Models

Machine learning algorithms to identify patterns and progression

Assessment Tools

Standardized measures for cognitive, clinical, and functional evaluation

Implications and Future Directions: Toward Personalized Interventions

Clinical Implications
  • Supports the development of personalized treatment strategies based on individual progression profiles
  • Suggests different intervention targets for different subtypes
  • Provides a framework for prognostic assessment by identifying which patients may be on different disease trajectories
Research Directions
  • Examine additional neuroimaging modalities beyond structural connectivity
  • Investigate other potential brain regions that might lead disease progression
  • Develop more sophisticated modeling approaches
  • Conduct longitudinal studies to validate progression sequences

Recent follow-up research has already begun extending these findings across neuroimaging modalities. A 2025 study examining resting-state functional MRI found similar progression patterns, suggesting these trajectories are robust across different measurement techniques 2 6 . Importantly, this research also indicated that different imaging modalities might provide complementary information 2 .

Precision Psychiatry Approach
Tailoring Interventions to Individual Profiles

The identification of distinct psychosis subtypes with different progression trajectories supports a precision psychiatry approach that moves beyond one-size-fits-all treatments.

Cognitive Training
For Subtype 1 with prominent cognitive impairments
Connectivity-Focused Approaches
For Subtype 2 with hippocampal dysconnectivity

Conclusion: Piecing Together the Multiscale Puzzle

The multiscale approach to psychosis represents a fundamental shift in how we understand severe mental illness. By examining how processes across biological, cognitive, and functional domains interact over time, researchers are beginning to unravel the heterogeneity that has long complicated both treatment and research.

Key Insights
  • The journey from hippocampal centrality to functional outcome illustrates how subtle alterations cascade through cognitive processes
  • Identification of distinct subtypes offers hope for more targeted interventions
  • Complexity, rather than oversimplification, may hold the key to better outcomes
Path Forward
  • Continue mapping multiscale interactions
  • Develop sophisticated models capturing dynamic nature of psychosis
  • Translate insights into personalized interventions
  • Address unique progression pathways of each individual

The path forward lies in continuing to map these multiscale interactions, developing increasingly sophisticated models that can capture the dynamic nature of psychosis, and translating these insights into personalized interventions that address the unique progression pathways of each individual.

References